Science- The Vibringe system has been compared with PUI and conventional irrigation. ?The Vibringe System demonstrated significantly better results than syringe irrigation in the apical part of the root canal (P = .011).? Continuous irrigation and activation of the Vibringe turns out to be effective: ?the flushing action of the irrigant is the main factor for debris removal in the grooves?. This study is published in the Journal of Endodontics of July 2010. - A new scientific study is available now. The Department of Endodontics of the Tokyo Dental College executed an in depth study on the efficiency of the Vibringe in comparison to conventional irrigation. The results show very positive outcomes for the smear layer removal with the use of the Vibringe. For a transcript of the study, please click here. - Vibringe BV is very proud to show the first results of a scientific study conducted by the University of Athens, Greece. This study clearly shows the advantages of sonic irrigation over conventional and irrigation. The results underline the effect of the Vibringe as the next level of endodontic hand irrigation. - Studies show that sonic irrigation has far better results than conventional hand irrigation. The studies, mentioned below, show that there is no significant difference between sonic and ultrasonic irrigation. Literature review: - Jensen, Hutter et al, J Endod Nov 1999 state there is no significant difference between sonic and ultrasonic activation. - Lumley, Walmsley et al, J Endod Sept 1993 state there is no difference between sonic or ultrasonic activation as to remaining debris or smear layer. - Caron G: Cleaning efficiency of the apical millimeters of curved canals usingthree different modalities of irrigant activation: an SEM Study; Master Thesis Part 1 and 2, Paris 7 University (Paris, France), 2006. Sonic irrigation has shown, again, to produce statistically significantly cleaner canals. Study emphasis was on the apical one-third. Importantly, the second study in conjunction with the first study, provided a sufficient sample size for statistical analysis and scientific validation. - Akveld NAE, Hiep STP: The efficacy of sonic irrigation and type of irrigant on removing artificially placed dentine debris from the apical root canal, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) in association with Department of Endodontology of University of La Sapienza (Rome, Italy), 2007.Passive sonic irrigation produced statistically significantly cleaner canals. Sonic irrigation realizes a superior removal of dentine debris compared to irrigant only". Besides that sonic irrigation can be consideres as low risk and no damage or breakage will occur. - At the moment several well-known universities are executing extensive research. Within a short period of time, you will be able to review published scientific articles supporting our concept. |
||
|
|
created by: usefulBits | |
|
For full enjoyment of this website you'll need a Flash plug-in higher than version 8.0 and javascript enabled Download the latest Flash plug-in and/or enable javascript in your browser Download the latest Flash plug-in HERE |
||